<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tom Kelshaw - Digital Strategy Enthusiast &#187; seo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomkelshaw.com/tag/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomkelshaw.com</link>
	<description>Digital Strategist and all-round nice guy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:37:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Yellow Pages starts getting friendly with Google?</title>
		<link>http://tomkelshaw.com/2008/yellow-pages-googlesearch-friendly/</link>
		<comments>http://tomkelshaw.com/2008/yellow-pages-googlesearch-friendly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Kelshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aus Digital Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yellow pages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomkelshaw.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like Sol Trujillo and the Sensis team have finally realised that their flagship product &#8211; everyone&#8217;s favourite impromptu monitor-stand &#8211; &#8220;Yellow&#8220;, might not be worth its (singificant) weight in dead trees unless it&#8217;s open to search engine indexing.
From B&#38;T Magazine (Australia)
YELLOW.COM.AU OPENS UP
Sensis has opened the door of www.yellow.com.au, to search engines for the
first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Sol Trujillo and the Sensis team have finally realised that their flagship product &#8211; everyone&#8217;s favourite impromptu monitor-stand &#8211; &#8220;<a href="http://yellowpages.com.au">Yellow</a>&#8220;, might not be worth its (singificant) weight in dead trees unless it&#8217;s open to search engine indexing.</p>
<p><em><strong>From <a href="http://www.bandt.com.au/news/05/0C058B05.asp">B&amp;T Magazine</a> (Australia)</strong></em></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>YELLOW.COM.AU OPENS UP</strong><br />
Sensis has opened the door of www.yellow.com.au, to search engines for the<br />
first time. The move enables search engines such as Google, Yahoo and Live<br />
Search to index the 2 million-plus listings on www.yellow.com.au and make<br />
them available to people using search engines to find local businesses.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now the big search-marketing question will be: what link-juice will a keyword-rich inbound link from Yellow.com.au direct to its customers?</p>
<h3>How Yellow Pages manages outbound links<strong><br />
</strong></h3>
<p><a href="http://tomkelshaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/tom-kelshaw-yellow-pages-search-link.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-40 alignright" title="tom-kelshaw-yellow-pages-search-link" src="http://tomkelshaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/tom-kelshaw-yellow-pages-search-link.jpg" alt="Yellow Pages Google Screenshot" width="345" height="135" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Link text:</strong> Domain printed out its entirety only, no description of services at all, just http://www.jcandsonsplumbing.com</p>
<p><strong>Anchor url:</strong> Convuluted. The server code Yellow.com.au use to redirect and track outbound links to their customers would probably confuse, or simply annoy, the Googlebot. At least it&#8217;s no longer &#8220;NOFOLLOW&#8221; <img src='http://tomkelshaw.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>PageRank of Yellow.com.au</strong>: PR7. This puts it amongst the big hitters, which opens opportunities for them to start up-selling their (I assume) declining customer-base with offers of paid link inclusion. Craftily disguised <em><strong>of course</strong></em> as some kind of editorial business-directory , so as not to attract the wrathful attention of G&#8217;s web-spam team.</p>
<p><strong>Overall: </strong>I&#8217;ll be interested to see how Yellow.com.au upgrade their offering to leverage their PageRank and offer value-added inbound links to customers with websites.</p>
<h3><strong>Save your money, create a $200 website and SEO it</strong></h3>
<p>The move to open up Yellow&#8217;s walled-garden to Google <em>et al</em> might be seen as an acknowledgement that a growing proportion of Australian consumers now turns to the Big White Page rather than the Old Yellow Pages for their commercial search requirements. I often get asked by clients whether they should place an ad in the Yellow Pages, and increasingly I tell them: &#8220;Pay some kid with half a clue to make you a one-page website, organise some good inbound links and you&#8217;ll get more inbound phonecalls.&#8221;</p>
<h3>Oh *SNAP* &#8211; Google don&#8217;t list in Yellow Pages</h3>
<p>Search for &#8220;Google&#8221; in the Yellow Pages. Go on, I&#8217;ll wait. &#8230; &#8230; HAHHHAHA funny, no?</p>
<h3><strong><strong>Comment bait &#8211; Do you *ever* use the Yellow Pages?</strong></strong></h3>
<p>Print version? Or yellow.com.au ? I&#8217;m curious who actually uses this service anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tomkelshaw.com/2008/yellow-pages-googlesearch-friendly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Google use Analytics accounts to link SEO domain ownership?</title>
		<link>http://tomkelshaw.com/2008/does-google-use-analytics-accounts-to-link-seo-domain-ownership/</link>
		<comments>http://tomkelshaw.com/2008/does-google-use-analytics-accounts-to-link-seo-domain-ownership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 12:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Kelshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomkelshaw.com/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the tactics employed by Search Engine Optimisation Marketers is to create their own link network of niche sites that contain pages that rank well for certain keywords. All these sites are operated by the same marketer, and are used to boost the inbound link popularity of other pages within their network. These sites [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the tactics employed by Search Engine Optimisation Marketers is to create their own link network of niche sites that contain pages that rank well for certain keywords. All these sites are operated by the same marketer, and are used to boost the inbound link popularity of other pages within their network. These sites still need to maintain strong rankings in their own right, but owning your own link network can give you some extra inbounds for a little boost, and every little boost counts.</p>
<h3>Networked sites on the same webhost</h3>
<p>Being the paranoid bunch they are, SEO Marketers speculate that Google&#8217;s algorithm takes the webhosting location of sites in a link network into account. Basically, if sites are on the same C-block IP, there&#8217;s a chance they&#8217;re on the same hosting account, and being managed by the same person. Google may view this relationship with suspicion.</p>
<p>Whether google checks <a href="http://forums.searchenginewatch.com/showthread.php?t=9408">C-block IPs is debated</a>.  Whether google penalises for it, or not, is also contested.</p>
<h3>SEO Marketers trick Google by hosting on different C-Block IPs</h3>
<p>Regardless, there are <a href="http://www.seohosting.com/">webhosting companies sprouting up</a> capitalising on this speculation, offering hosting packages with different C-blocks. This way you can manage all your networked sites via the same provider, but Google won&#8217;t know it&#8217;s you.</p>
<h3>But don&#8217;t use the same Google Analytics account</h3>
<p>Putting on my aluminium foil hat, I wonder whether tracking your link network sites with the same google analytics account is a dead giveaway to the omniscient one?? Does Analytics data be fed into Google&#8217;s algorithm. Or are the index, ranking and analytics dbs totally silo&#8217;d??</p>
<p>What do you think? Am I just being paranoid, or is google able to take advantage of owning the world&#8217;s data to reduce the effectiveness of sneaky seo marketing tactics?</p>
<p><em><strong>Your conspiracy theories, hearsay and rank speculation are all welcome.</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tomkelshaw.com/2008/does-google-use-analytics-accounts-to-link-seo-domain-ownership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
