<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Google use Analytics accounts to link SEO domain ownership?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomkelshaw.com/2008/does-google-use-analytics-accounts-to-link-seo-domain-ownership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomkelshaw.com/2008/does-google-use-analytics-accounts-to-link-seo-domain-ownership/</link>
	<description>Digital Strategist and all-round nice guy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:04:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Martin</title>
		<link>http://tomkelshaw.com/2008/does-google-use-analytics-accounts-to-link-seo-domain-ownership/comment-page-1/#comment-5244</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomkelshaw.com/?p=28#comment-5244</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never been stupid enough to have my own site under the same google analytics account. - Hell so far I&#039;ve avoided it entirely. (We really need a server-side alternative anyway!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But at a previous employer (who&#039;s original website was very powerful) I created new websites and tracked them with the same analytics account. The new sites still saw a massive boost after receiving a link from the strong site. But I couldn&#039;t say whether the links power was reduced at all. The sites were on different but adjacent (same class C) IPs BTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve never been stupid enough to have my own site under the same google analytics account. &#8211; Hell so far I&#39;ve avoided it entirely. (We really need a server-side alternative anyway!)</p>
<p>But at a previous employer (who&#39;s original website was very powerful) I created new websites and tracked them with the same analytics account. The new sites still saw a massive boost after receiving a link from the strong site. But I couldn&#39;t say whether the links power was reduced at all. The sites were on different but adjacent (same class C) IPs BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash Nallawalla</title>
		<link>http://tomkelshaw.com/2008/does-google-use-analytics-accounts-to-link-seo-domain-ownership/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash Nallawalla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomkelshaw.com/?p=28#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Webmaster Tools is another way to identify a common owner, although I know SEO companies who load their client sites in a GWT or GA account. I have two of my non-technical friend&#039;s sites under my GA account.

Similarly, web devs host their client sites on their own server - an algo would not know that the sites are not owned by one person.

All this speculation may be true in a manual audit by Matt Cutts&#039; team, but I doubt if the ranking algo would check GA as a routine step.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webmaster Tools is another way to identify a common owner, although I know SEO companies who load their client sites in a GWT or GA account. I have two of my non-technical friend&#8217;s sites under my GA account.</p>
<p>Similarly, web devs host their client sites on their own server &#8211; an algo would not know that the sites are not owned by one person.</p>
<p>All this speculation may be true in a manual audit by Matt Cutts&#8217; team, but I doubt if the ranking algo would check GA as a routine step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
